The infamous list of 200 treacherous websites has reignited the “information war” narrative (the list is by some suspected to originate from immature Ukrainian hackers). But that war is in reality notÂ about Russia, itâ€™s about us. Itâ€™s about our insidious propaganda served with arrogance as if it were truisms. It’s our self-righteous presumption that â€œthe othersâ€ are biased, but we (by mere definition) are not, since we always represent the objective reality. And itâ€™s this loathsome conceit propagated in mainstream media all over the western world, almost verbatim identical everywhere.
To be fair, there are honest and skillful journalists and reporters, and there are independent media outlets. But for the core of mainstream media the judgement above is quite valid uniformly. And that observation is certainly no innovation; Herman & Chomsky wrote the standard work on the topic some 20 years ago.
But why take the side of Russia? I donâ€™t think Iâ€™m alone in opposing the western narrative without having any specific affiliation with Russia. Itâ€™s undoubtedly an interesting and multifaceted country which we know much too little about. But there are traits in the Russian ethos, such as a kind of roughness and emotionality, in which I wouldnâ€™t fit in very well.
The reason to fiercely oppose the western anti-Russian propaganda is not just that itâ€™s unfair, ignorant and often plain stupid, but above all that it threatens to create a development that ultimately may lead to the obliteration of humanity. The very thought that the distorted narrative poured over us by our media with such irresponsible nonchalance might bring us ever closer to the final nuclear shoot-out is just unbearable.
During the first Cold War there was no interest in finding out the Russian points of view at all. Had there been any interest, there was no Internet to do it with anyway. The only picture we had was formed by the unanimous Anti-Communist canon, not subject to objections. Today the scenario is totally different.
Editorial writers in our petrified MSM are themselves evidences to this by getting tantrums about â€œPutinâ€™s information warâ€, conducted through media outlets like RT and others. With this our MSM probably reach just the most ignorant or apologetic among their audiences, but they completely miss the informed and conscious ones. And that’s a serious neglect since RTâ€™s posts on Youtube have been visited more than 3 billion times, far more than any other TV-broadcasting news outlet has achieved.
So, they are shooting their own feet point blank. They provide RT and its colleagues with the most effective marketing efforts â€“ for free. People have computers and it takes a few seconds to get to RT.com. And there, probably to their surprise, they will find that â€œPutinâ€™s information armyâ€ is a Foreign Legion, manned mostly by an enlightened crew of US and western European citizens. Theyâ€™ll have to look hard to find a single Russian reporter.
But, alas, we have the talk show host Sophie Shevardnadze, granddaughter of a former Soviet Foreign Minister. Sounds Russian enough. Well, sheâ€™s of Georgian descent (a country nowadays induced by the West to become an enemy to Russia), moved to Paris at age 10, then on to USA where she studied at both Boston and New York University, speaks idiomatic American English. So much for Russia there.
What people curious of RT certainly find are some well substantiated news that never appear in their domestic media (of course there is also a small share ofÂ “local” Russian material, easy to skip for anyone who wishes). And they can listen to numerous western scholars, pundits, journalists and other experts talking about issues and taking standpoints ignored or suppressed at home. Thatâ€™s the basis for RTâ€™s success and for the new â€œRed Scareâ€ in our domains. Itâ€™s in a way a popular revolution against western corporate media which for at least a century have been using their dominance to manufacture consent in a way that serves economic power, the only indisputable power in our societies.