Follows a collection of commentaries I’ve made in the New York Times Readerâ€™s Comments section on different articles (mostly for me keeping track of them myself). Theyâ€™ll be accessible as long as NYT keeps the links alive, I suppose.
31 January 2015. A comment on the vaccine debate that followed the recent outbreak of measles in U.S.:
25 March 2015. On signs of increasing poverty albeit growing wealth in the society (Sweden) as a whole:
30 March 2015. On the horrific number of deaths in China during the Mao era, which we constantly are reminded of, compared to the even larger mortality caused by capitalism in India â€“ which we very seldom hear of:
3 April 2015. Another complete imbalance in our fields of interest: our laser-like scrutiny of terrorism carried out by others, compared to the forbearance with our own, much graver and deadlier terrorist activities:
9 May 2015. This article appeared simultaneously in NYT and Dagens Nyheter (Sweden), not surprisingly. Itâ€™s that kind of text our propaganda model loves: a Russian author who more or less regrets that his country defeated Nazi Germany in WWII. He just thinks that one oppression was replaces by another, obviously unaware of the Naziâ€™s Generalplan Ost which aimed at exterminating most people in Russia and enslaving the rest. This was not some high-flying Nazi plan or empty threat, it was implemented from day one of the German invasion. The existence of the special Sonderkommando with the explicit task to exterminate Jews, Communists and other unwanted humans was the terrible evidence of that reality.
One could have hoped that NYT and DN hadÂ been kind enough to save the poor ignorant (or just propagandistic) author from his embarrassment, but the temptation to publish his sentimental excesses was maybe to overwhelming. As some Readers’ Comments point out, the article was also a slap in the face on Putin and Russia, on the very day, sacred for Russians, of commemorating the death of 27 million people which Russia had to sacrifice to defeat the most atrocious and inhuman ideology in all history: Nazism.
An interesting difference: Dagens Nyheter didn’t open its comment section on this article, as opposed to New York Times. This is one reflection on the difference in effective freedom of expression which is taken much more seriously in the U.S. than in Europe. My comment, like some other critical ones, was listed as â€œNYT Pickâ€ by the editor, another sign of openness for critique. But on the other hand: the propaganda gain was taken home by the printed article. (I suppose that the readerâ€™s comments are mostly read by the commentators themselves.)
11 May 2015. A comment on one of Paul Krugmanâ€™s many enlightened columns in NYT.
17 May 2015. An article on the prospects for western economy after the last collapse, with discussions about singularities, neglecting the overall picture.