Self-perpetuating terrorism – ours and theirs

And now also Nice…

Summer in Sweden will not take off; it’s chilly and the sky is shedding tears. Our weather matches the situation in the world these days. Shootings and bombings everywhere, perpetual wars, millions on the run from one devastated country to another, richer societies creating barriers to stem the flow coming towards them. How crazy have we become as a species?

We hold life as an invaluable gift, and rightly so. We who happen to live should feel extremely lucky since it’s almost improbable that only (and precisely) we are given a life in this endless universe. And we mostly do cherish life intensely; at least we protect our nearest and dearest from dying, with all our might.

But we are certainly not consistent. The lives of people we call enemies or whom we dislike for some reason whatsoever are not at all sacred for us. Against them we might stage what we call a war, and then feel free to kill them indiscriminately.

My US online media outlet illustrated this one-sided moral after the Orlando shootings. For days they expressed their deep grief and their heartfelt compassion with the victim’s families and friends. It was clear that they considered the lives of the killed human beings very dear and that the perpetrator had committed an unforgivable deed. Back to back with such a sacred celebration of life one could then read a call for the US to send more deadly weapons to the rebels in Syria to make them capable of ending more lives.

Our mainstream opinion is not just inconsistent but also shoddy racist. And Swedish media don’t deviate from that main stream. The horrible shootings in Paris and Orlando were covered broadly and in detail, and with warm compassion with the victims. A much worse bombing in Baghdad was just mentioned quite briefly and with demonstrative lack of empathy. Realizing this, one Kareem Rahaman wrote on Twitter: “More deaths in Iraq in the last week than Paris and Orlando combined but nobody is changing their profile pics, building colors, etc.”

If we look for a rational behind this discriminatory thinking we don’t find any. It’s not nearness: Orlando Florida is more than double the distance from Stockholm than Bagdad. Is it religion? Hardly, since a large majority of Swedes don’t care about Gods and prophets and probably would be just as much unsettled by the many fundamentalist Christians in the US as by any Muslim. Is it the color of skin and hair? OK, then it’s racism and that’s not rational. And besides: a number of the Orlando victims were black people.

Basically it’s a matter of politics (usually not rational in a deeper sense either). Initially the West made Muslims their enemies for colonialist reasons. We mostly beat them to a pulp, stole their assets, rearranged their territories, in short subjugated them under our will (Iraq is a textbook case). Eventually, and far from surprisingly, they started fighting back. And that’s where we are today.

US and Britain made the most arrogant and ignorant move when they launched the completely illegal and thoroughly immoral war of aggression against Iraq, whereby setting the entire region on fire. The horrible upturn of Muslim terrorism is a clear-cut product of western terrorism, the latter so far much worse. We may just look at the instructive roots of ISIS.

The leader of ISIS – al Baghdadi – was initially an insignificant young theologian; “contemporaries of al-Baghdadi describe him in his youth as being shy, unimpressive, a religious scholar, and a man who eschewed violence” (Wikipedia). How he developed from this quiet status to the world’s most feared and hated terrorist is illustrative of the methods by which to create enraged enemies. He simply witnessed the grotesque assault by US troops on Fallujah, where patients were thrown out of hospitals and innocent people killed randomly. That experience transformed him completely, just as western violence on the whole creates innumerable other terrorists.

President Holland of France said yesterday that he will go to war against terrorism. If he hasn’t a completely new concept it will continue to be a war to promote terrorism, both theirs and ours.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *