â€œRussiaâ€™s Emergencies Ministry has dispatched the 52nd truck convoy with humanitarian aid to Donbassâ€ reports RT.com. â€œSince August 2014, Russia has sent 51 convoys with 61,000 tons of humanitarian aid to Donbass.â€ According to the ministryâ€™s press service the 52nd delivery consist largely of â€œfoodstuffs, daily essentials, medicines, firefighting equipment, and art and educational booksâ€.
These kinds of news will never appear in Swedish media, of course. (I suppose our MSM would rather describe them as examples of the Russian â€œinformation warâ€ which perpetually obsess them). The only convoy of interest was the first one, as we remember. It was made an object of suspicion: â€œRussian tricks to smuggle weapons and contrabandâ€, or ridicule: â€œsome of the trucks are emptyâ€.
After a long time waiting for permits from Kiev to cross the border – permits that never came – the first convoy just took off to its destinations and unloaded. That was the last we heard from these humanitarian expeditions in our media. The New York Times though â€“ a few convoys later – had an informative article about the living conditions in eastern Donbass in which the reporter interviewed a restaurant owner who testified that these deliveries of basic means of existence were essential for life in the haunted region.
There is no need to regard the Russian government as more altruistic then other governments to be able to explain these relief operations. They simply help people of Russian heritage or affinity in need. The urge to help may (or may not) be enhanced by the Kremlin refusal to fulfill the deepest wishes of these people, namely to join their spiritual motherland. In fact, Russia helps citizens in a foreign country, moreover a country before whom Russia (even in a resolution to the United Nations Security Council) has pledged to respect and protect its independence and sovereignty (with Crimea as an exclusive exception).
The despicable Putin is determined that people in all of Donbass shall stay Ukrainian citizens forever. What Kremlin supports is simply that some degree of self-determination be granted people there. Kiev on the other hand obviously sees the inhabitants in rebel held parts of Ukraine as enemies suitable to kill with artillery shells. Consequently, those Ukrainians donâ€™t qualify for humanitarian aid from Kiev, instead they suffer elimination of their economic rights, such as pensions and other allowances.
This doesnâ€™t fit well with western propaganda. Russia is presumed to occupy eastern Donbass and wage a war against Ukraine, supposedly with the intention to conquer the entire country. Thatâ€™s anyway what the leaders in Kiev repeatedly have claimed, supported by western media. In order to uphold that distorted view it is necessary to disregard and keep behind a smokescreen everything substantial of what Moscow says and does.
Itâ€™s self-evident that states and governments are no moral agents; they can say and do whatever they have the power to do and say. The Russian government is no exception. But governmentâ€™s statements and actions can and should be constantly scrutinized by their citizens, and their possible lies and wrong-doings revealed.
As mere citizens we should also comply with the principle of moral universalism, which states that we must follow the same standards as we apply to others. We should hence as Swedes meticulously dissect our own propaganda before we accuse others of the same misconduct. This principle is violated to a level of absurdity by media in my country; themselves distorting facts and serving half-lies and pure lies without discrimination, aggressively accuse Russia of waging an â€œinformation warâ€.
One of the â€œstate controlledâ€ outlets for this Russian propaganda is said to be RT, the most visited TV news channel on YouTube. Vilifying RT may sooner or later prove to be an own goal as more and more people take part of the media market unconstrained by our usual, self-censored media. If anything, the accusations may lure people to watch the defamed â€œpropaganda channelsâ€ themselves, if not for other reason than pure curiosity.
Those who look up RT.com to check for the propaganda will find a bunch of citizens from western countries â€“ US, Britain, Irland etcetera â€“ presenting news and writing editorials in impeccable English. One needs to look hard to find any genuine Russians. The selection of news is naturally focused on Russia, but RT also digs up other events that we seldom hear anything of. Thus we can in RT read about inconvenient demonstrations and embarrassing statements (like for instance this one: â€œWWII happened because Russia attacked Germany, and that must be prevented from happening againâ€ /paraphrase/, uttered by Yatsenyuk during his visit to Merkel) which are more or less suppressed by western media.
We are back to one of the simplest truisms among definitions: â€œPropaganda isÂ the other guy’s lies, not mine”.