Finally Dagens Nyheter got to â€“ almost â€“ say that Putin is a killer. But, all right, even if he didn’t personally order the assassination of Boris Nemtsov it was a â€œproduct of the Russian systemâ€ with the indisputable purpose to â€œhit the democratic opposition with a devastating blowâ€. DN â€œknowsâ€ everything without any knowledge or shred of evidence, in this case as in the downing of MH17, the snipers in Maidan, the Russian invasion, Putinâ€™s intentions and everything else. This flagship in Swedish media thus gladly leaves behind the basic journalistic ethics that calls for factuality in reporting.
One particularly interesting thing DN â€œknowsâ€ is that Putin hasn’t changed his â€œperception that Ukraine does not have a real legitimacy as an independent countryâ€. This is DNs statement not many days after Russia submitted a resolution to the UN Security Council with the precise call for Ukraineâ€™s unity and national integrity. The resolution was passed, which indeed wasn’t highlighted in DN.
Even in New York Times a reporter expressed some astonishment over this Russian standpoint in UN of Ukrainian unity as if she had never heard of it, though Putin and Lavrov consistently have upheld the same view from the very beginning. They declared in words and showed in action that Russia had no intention of occupying southeastern Ukraine (at first to the obvious disappointment of the separatists).
But, OK, decent western democratic media cannot pay attention to men like those two. Instead they have dutifully published Yatsenjukâ€™s repeated assurances, groundless and obviously based on his own fantasies that Russia intended to conquer the entire Ukraine. NYTs reporter fell victim of western propaganda, DN hasn’t even noticed anything(?)
Sweden probably outscores Russia for the last 30 years when it comes to assassinations of high profile politicians relative to population. (I suppose we have to ask DN if this is a â€œproduct of the Swedish systemâ€ or not.) First we had the murder in 1986 of Prime Minister Olof Palme, as much lauded among poor people around the world as he was demonized by the â€œdecentâ€ bourgeoisie at home. The horrible slander and scorn Palme had to endure has no parallel in Swedish politics ever.
Ridiculous rumors about Palme spread like wildfire among the well-offs in Stockholm: he was mentally ill (for visiting his demented mother treated in a hospital), he was a drug addict (â€œmy wifeâ€™s sister knows a doctor who treats him for thatâ€¦â€), he was a communist spy, he had extra-marital affairs etc. The fine peopleâ€™s fantasies were limitless. The following caricatureÂ is one of the most benevolent made of him (the really horrible ones, endemic during his lifetime, seem to have disappeared from the Internet):
Many thought that the hate campaign had triggered someone to commit the murder. Suspicions flew in all directions (I’m quite sure that some believed Soviet Russia could have had a hand in it) and strangely detailed testimonies popped up from all over. The chief investigator followed a Kurdish trail, but choked on it and was replaced. Most popular among a growing number of amateur investigators was a police track, soon supported by a host of incidental “evidence”. And so it went on under intense media coverage.Â The case was never solved although some circumstances ultimately pointed at an alcoholic and thug, possibly hired by some other criminal.
Victim of the second high profile murder was Anna Lindh, stabbed by a mentally unstable man in 2003. She was also a Social Democrat, active Foreign Minister and much liked by her international colleagues. Any connections between the murderer and any outside monitors were never discovered, and everybody seemed pleased with that.
We have at least a third murder with political motives. A syndicalist, Anders SÃ¶derberg, was murdered by neo-Nazis in 1999 for disclosing one of their cronies (which made him lose his job). That makes three political assassinations in thirty years, which would be equivalent to 45 such murders in Russia in the same period. Some expert may pick the winner.
We will never know if there ultimately were political forces behind the murders of Palme and Lindh, and further speculations are pointless. In contrast our main newspaper, supposed to be the most serious, feels obviously free to speculate wildly on their preconceived stereotypes about Russian political murders.
Itâ€™s worth saying again: Apparently Vladimir Putinâ€™s real crime in the eyes of DNs journalists and other western ideologues is that he put an end to the capitalist melt-down in Russia, stopped the genocide caused by the same capitalist roll-over, a genocide that claimed 10 million lives of which a majority were younger men leaving children and women fatherless and widows. It took harsh measures to reclaim a small part of the fortunes belonging to the people and stolen by a bunch of cunning apparatchiks. Itâ€™s not done with a tea party to passably rescue the complete wreck Russia was in the 1990s.
If some are to blame for the fact that Vladimir Putin is ruling Russia and not someone like Mahatma Gandhi it would be first of all Yeltsin, Gaidar and a group of American economists (with the Swede Anders Ã…slund). Boris Nemtsov was also a player onÂ that team, certainly a reason for his low public acceptance rate now. These ruthless ideologues, purporting to implement “economic rules”, completely destroyed everything, wiped out half the industrial capacity and threw the country back to the third world from where it came in 1917. If our reactionary demagogues now dictating the paradigm had at least an ounce of empathy in their bodies, they would give Russia a minimum of leeway in its effortsÂ to build a modern society again. How they might think that the confrontation they now play hard with will solve anything is a mystery.