Ceasefire in Ukraine and Putin seems to accept it, and more than that, even push for it. Strange, since the Prime minister of Ukraine, Arseniy Yatsenjuk, from the very beginning insured us that Putinâ€™s Russia wanted to conquer the entire Ukraine. And this PM should be a most credible man, appointed by a high US official as he is, and fully endorsed all the way by our main paper, Dagens Nyheter (DN).
Well, Yatsenjuk has made a lot of statements, most of them uncritically echoed by western media without any demands forÂ proof. Most every week he has reported on thousands of Russian troops and hundreds of tanks entering his country, probably in total adding up to a full mechanized division by now (if anyone bothered with a calculator). DN has broken a fundamental journalistic rule by simply conveying these obviously propagandistic fabrications, no questions asked.
Indeed, some of Yatsâ€™ statements have remained concealed, such as the one he delivered during a visit to Angela Merkel, where he certified that it was Russia that had attacked Germany in WWII, something â€œthat would not be allowed to happen againâ€. Likewise hidden from public eyes by DN was the infamous claim by a Ukrainian Defense minister that Luhansk had been lost due to the Russians using nuclear weapons. What mainstream media yet not fully realize is that conspiratory and manipulating journalism in a longer run inexorably backfires in a world where more and more people willÂ pick up the missing information on the Internet.
For a year now DN has fed its readers with an almost daily flow of these ill-founded, propagandistic and sometimes simply mendacious articles with the single aim to defame Russia and Putin. It has been an exhibition of low journalistic standards opposing the prime values that proper professional schools on the subject teach.
In this very moment a news flash reveals that Ukrainian forces are leaving Debaltseve (a city in trouble, obviously ignored by Poroshenko during the Minsk talks). Spokesmen for the â€œpro-Russian separatistsâ€ say â€“ according to DN – that hundreds of government troops have surrendered to the rebels, â€œinformation not independently confirmedâ€ (information from the other side never requires this reservation by DN).
Still there is a new tone in DNâ€™s reporting just recently, illustrated by another article in todayâ€™s paper. Putinâ€™s visit to Hungary was described in a short article without the usual demonizing distortion of facts. And maybe it generalizes.
New York Times has an informative article also today about the really catastrophic abyss in which Ukraineâ€™s economy has fallen. The author points at some crucial sectors where Ukraineâ€™s dependence of Russia for a long times has been decisive, and shows the devastating effects the breakup with Russia have had. After reading this text one is totally puzzled by the naivety the pro-western UkrainiansÂ have shown in believing that western countries would even have the resources to compensate for this huge Russian economic dependency, let alone the political will to do it.
Maybe the naivety of western leaders when searching an easy propaganda victory by punching Putin in the face will rebound too. Hopefully we will see more sobriety in the days to come.
(If the simplest of solutions wasn’t self-evident: autonomy in any form for Donbas, Ukraine a neutral state, no NATO, no EU.)